Skip to the main argument at 8:05
This video is a culmination of my online debate versus noted debunker and UFO skeptic Mick West about the validity of the leaked and confirmed legitimate Gimbal UAP video filmed by Navy pilots off the East Coast of the US in 2015.
You can see his most recent video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG49Tpb_los&t=26sI finish my initial argument of determining how far away this object is and its size. I use milliradian math techniques used by combat aviators and snipers to determine the size. The result is pretty exciting and I believe settles the debate that the Gimbal UAP is in fact not a fighter or other small airplane. It is still in fact unexplainable by our current understanding of physics.
Thank you for watching, please like and subscribe if you like my content!
Join the UAP squadron at Patreon.com/chrislehto
Take care,
Chris
Links in the video:
Jeremy Corbell John Ehrhart interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fefUZAGtCO4Understanding Mils
National Shooting Sports Foundation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5AGsHSIsVo&t=127sPixel Prophecy - Great Channel!
Lens Flares, What causes them...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaHVdA8KLtw&t=393s00:00 Intro
1:27 Mick's Spinning "Glare" Argument
2:10 No example yet
2:38 Not shaped like lens flare
3:17 Doesn't Pulsate
3:50 Max NFOV
4:40 No other artifacts
5:12 Gimbal UAP grows 7%
5:47 Internal Gimbal is incorrect
6:25 FLIR Expert John Ehrhart interview short
7:43 experts say not spinning flare
8:05 MAIN ARGUMENT - If Mick West is correct
8:30 If Mick West is right
9:20 Mil Sizing
9:57 Milliradian sizing!!
11:30 How Big is this thing?
13:20 Hint: It's smaller than a fighter
14:34 My estimate
15:45 Conclusion